Published in The News on October 2nd, 2000

First, it was purported Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report published in Indian newspapers, followed by rumours about thousands of wealthy Pakistanis queuing outside western embassies begging for visas to get out of the country. And for the past six weeks or so a story has been making the rounds about a study conducted by the US Defence Deparment predicting a nuclear exchange between Pakistan and India, and the eventual disintegration of Pakistan by 2010.

This study has been quoted by almost every columnist in the country. I'm sure all those columnists who make use of such alarmist studies and reports in their columns are staunch patriots and have only the good of the country at heart, but one does wish that they would at least look upon the bright side occasionally. Like, for instance, the news that Edhi received an award the other day, or that we have men like Edhi at all, or even that the press in Pakistan is still free despite frequent criticism of the military government.

One columnist even compares the current situation to that prevailing in 1971 in erstwhile East Pakistan. But that was a different matter altogether. Every Pakistani who read foreign newspapers or listened to the BBC at the time knew that Pakistan's position was grim. But even after the fall of Dhaka, the Indians anticipated that what remained of Pakistan would soon break up into four separate units. This did not happen, as we know. Should we attribute our survival to luck or to the incompetence of our foes? Shouldn't we be grateful that despite the rampant corruption of politicians and others, we have managed to endure?

In April, columnist James Clad of the Washington Post prediccted the disintegration of India. He said, "I found evidence of abuses by security forces too numberous to doubt. The steady breakdown of national cohesion is strikingly reflected in the political parties campaign. These include appeals to Hindu fanaticism and caste unity."

I have not seen this article quoted in any Indian newspaper, perhaps because their journalists are mature enough to ignore such alarming reports about their country.

As for those who write of wealthy Pakistanis migrating overseas, the Canadian Embassy has issued 3,000 visas to such people. Mind you, each of these 3,000 Pakistanis had to transfer to Canada the equivalent of US$ 300,000 before being considered for the L-1 visa. I don't know about Canada, but I doubt if there are many Pakistanis who have the equivalent of three hundred thousand dollars "white money" (income on which income tax has been paid).

Clearly, most of those who can pay such an amount (plus visa charges, lawyer's fees, etc.) are not the types who declare their true income. It would be interesting to know if the Canadian government (which is so fond of lecturing to us on the need for restoring "civil" government) did anything to verify if the amounts remitted to Canada by the visa seekers were earned legally. (For all you know, some of the visa applicants may have been involved in the narcotics trade).

If Pakistan requests the Canadian government, I'm sure they will confiscate such illegally earned money and speedily return it to us, assuming that their love for democracy has not unduly clouded their sense of justice.

By Shakir Lakhani

 

 

0 comments